So what's really causing the endless cycles of warming and cooling, if it isn't a constantly changing "Greenhouse Effect" - with man to blame. The part we can see is called the visible spectrum. It also begs an obvious question: The first was the well-documented "Medieval Warm Period" where temperatures, at least in Europe as mentioned in our introduction, were significantly higher.
The UK Met Office, however, uses the satellite data to calibrate its own terrestrial record. But fortunately, a few have decided to do the right thing and take a stand against this evil, proving just how unscientifically founded global warming is and exposing those who are behind it.
The density of the gas is 10 to the 24th power number of molecules occupying a space of about 22 liters i. Before that came the " Medieval Warm Period ", in which temperatures were about the same as they are today.
How could this be an accurate record of the last millennium. In reading "scientific articles" one must also be very alert to use of the word "if". The loss of Arctic ice has been a big talking point for people who believe global warming is occurring.
A minority are climatologists. This is well within natural variability and may not have much to do with us. The orange region in Fig. All heated bodies emit radiation in the infrared range. Unfortunately, almost all of these models showing huge temperature gains have turned out to be wrong.
Marc Morano - Climate Depot November 4, 2: The new method allows scientists to fill in the gaps between existing weather stations, says climate scientist Christian Rodehacke from DMI, who also was not part of the new study. How much Arctic ice really matters is an open question since the very limited evidence we have suggests that a few decades ago, there was less ice than there is todaybut the same people who thought the drop in ice was noteworthy should at least agree that the increase is important as well.
And let's freely admit up front that what we offer here is a dissenting opinion, and surely we have "cherry-picked" the articles of others which are also contrary to the widely held current beliefs.
Then it was 2. Any deliberate misappropriation of funding would be a criminal offence for which the offender could be jailed.
In the end, McIntyre turned to the internet and its true freedom of the press, and today he is known to every serious climate scientist on the planet as the man who broke the hockey stick.
While you're pulling rabbits out of a hat, could you please bring me a Pepsi. Both of these climate phenomena are known to have occurred in the Northern Hemisphere, but several hundred years prior to the present, the majority of the Southern Hemisphere was primarily populated by indigenous peoples, where science and scientific observation was limited to non-existent.
Ultimately, the second law of thermodynamics requires that any heat which may have accumulated in the deep ocean will dissipate via various diffusive processes. We would say they have a strong correlation, and with a little mathematics, we could compare each one point-by-point on the graph and come up with a number that would tell us just how well they match each other, called a correlation coefficient.
The satellite data provides a detailed picture of temperature, down to just one square kilometre.
In the IPCC predicted — on its business-as-usual Scenario A — that from the Industrial Revolution till the present there would have been 4 Watts per square meter of radiative forcing caused by Man Fig.
They measure weather conditions frequently throughout the day at two meters above the surface. At the top of the pecking order of knowledge needs sit the fundamental laws of physics - for no matter what others may determine, the final results must obey the fundamental, established principles which determine the nature of all elemental matter.
Just look up the atomic absorption spectra for both, and do the math. This we politely declined, arguing that "debate" cannot prove or disprove science Of course, the highway is still there. In fact, the outturn is visibly well below even the least estimate. He's called "Anthropogenic Global Warming" It's hard to nail down exactly when the sky started falling, but certainly the work of Michael Mann provided its first global exposure.
Inthe IPCC said this: The entire RSS dataset for the months December to September shows global warming at an unalarming rate equivalent to just 1. McIntyre subjects Mann's PCA program to a "Monte Carlo" analysis - which inserts random data sets into the function - and discovered that no matter what data he fed it, the result was always the same.
One of our readers, Peter J. It is not plausible that any heat taken up by the deep ocean will suddenly warm the upper ocean and, via the upper ocean, the atmosphere. Global warmists have an unshakable faith that man-made carbon emissions will produce a hotter climate, causing natural disasters. Finally, how long will it be before the Freedom Clock Fig.
Predicted manmade radiative forcings IPCC. What about the global El Niño-Southern Oscillation? The El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is a set of interacting parts of a single global system of coupled ocean-atmosphere climate fluctuations that are believed to come about as a consequence of oceanic and atmospheric circulation.
Figure 4 and 5. Two Cheers for the Greenhouse Effect. Some global warming is necessary in order to make the Earth habitable for creatures like us.
Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are to blame for global warming since the s and not carbon dioxide, according to new research from the University of Waterloo published in the International Journal. The Great Global Warming Swindle is a polemical documentary film that suggests that the scientific opinion on climate change is influenced by funding and political factors, and questions whether scientific consensus on global warming exists.
The program was formally criticised by Ofcom, the UK broadcasting regulatory agency, which upheld complaints of misrepresentation made by David King. Below is a complete listing of the articles in “How to Talk to a Climate Skeptic,” a series by Coby Beck containing responses to the most common skeptical arguments on global warming.
Climate of Extremes: Global Warming Science They Don't Want You to Know [Patrick J. Michaels, Robert Balling Jr.] on hazemagmaroc.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Is the weather truly getting worse? When it comes to global warming, dire predictions seem to be all we see or hear.
Climatologists Patrick Michaels and Robert Balling Jr. explain why the news and information we receive about.Proof that global warming is not real